Public Scholarship Bibliography
Ambrozas, D. (1998). The university as public sphere. Canadian Journal of Communications, 23(1), 73-89. Available at:
Anonymous. (2004). Going public: Scholarship in pursuit of social justice. Social Problems, 51(1), 102. Available at:
Anyaegbunam, C., Karnell, A. P., Cheah, W. H., & Youngblood, J. D. (2005). Designing communication research for empowering
marginalized populations: A participatory methodology. In S. H. Priest (Ed.), Communication impact: Designing research that
matters (pp. 49-65). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Applegate, J. L., & Morreale, S. P. (2001, Fall). Creating engaged disciplines. Campus Compact Reader, 2(2), 2-6.
Asen, R. (2000). Seeking the 'counter' in counterpublics. Communication Theory, 10, 424-446.
Asen, R. (2003). The multiple Mr. Dewey: Multiple publics and permeable borders in John Dewey's theory of the public sphere.
Argumentation & Advocacy, 39, 174-188.
Baynes, K. (1994). Communicative ethics, the public sphere and communication media. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 11, 315-
Calhoun, C. (2005, February). Rethinking the public sphere. Paper presented to the Ford Foundation.
Cantor, N., & Lavine, S. D. (2006, June 9). Taking public scholarship seriously. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B20. Available at:
Cohen, J. (2006). A laboratory for public scholarship and democracy. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 105, 7-15. Available
Colbeck, C. L., & Michael, P. W. (2006). The public scholarship: Reintegrating Boyer's four domains. New Directions for Institutional
Research, no. 129, 7-19. Available at: http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=20655687
Community-Campus Partnerships for Health. (2007). Achieving the promise of authentic community-higher education partnerships:
Community partners speak out! Retrieved January 28, 2008, from http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/CPS-chapter.pdf
Cooper, D. D. (2002, Spring). The making of a public scholar. Campus Compact Reader, 3(1), 1-3, 15-19.
Dahlgren, P. (1987). Ideology and information in the public sphere. In J. D. Slack & F. Fejes (Eds.), The ideology of the information age
(pp. 24-46). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Della-Piana, C. K., & Anderson, J. A. (1995). Performing community: Community service as cultural conversation. Communication Studies,
Deloria, V., Jr. (1991). Commentary: Research, redskins, and reality. American Indian Quarterly, 15, 457-468.
Dewey, J. (1927). The eclipse of the public. In The public and its problems (pp. 110-131). New York: Holt.
Dolan, J. (2001). Rehearsing democracy: Advocacy, public intellectuals, and civic engagement in theatre and performance studies.
Theatre Topics, 11(1), 1-17. Available at: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theatre_topics/v011/11.1dolan.html
Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society, 5, 185-202. Available at:
Eberly, R. A. (2006). Rhetorics of public scholarship: Democracy, doxa, and the human barnyard. New Directions for Teaching and
Learning, no. 105, 27-39. Available at: http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=20269020
Ferman, B., & Hill, T.L. (2004). The challenges of agenda conflict in higher-education-communication research partnerships: Views from
the community side. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26, 241-257.
Fogelman, E. (2002). Civic engagement at the University of Minnesota. Journal of Public Affairs, 6, 103-118. Available at:
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, no. 25/26,
Friedland, L. A. (2001). Communication, community, and democracy: Toward a theory of the communicatively integrated community.
Community Research, 28, 358-391. Available at: http://crx.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/28/4/358.pdf
Graubard, S. R. (2004). Public scholarship: A new perspective for the 21st century.
Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2000). Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research. In N. K.
Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 85-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Habermas, J. (2001). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article. In M. G. Durham & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies
(Revised ed., pp. 73-78). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. (Reprinted from Critical theory and society: A reader, pp. 136-142, by
S. E. Bronner & D. M. Kellner, Eds., 1989, New York: Routledge)
Hauser, G. A. (1998). Civil society and the principle of the public sphere. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 31(1), 19-40.
Hindman, E. B. (1998). Community, democracy, and neighborhood news. Journal of Communication, 48(2), 27-39.
Jensen, J. (2002). Arts, intellectuals and the public: The legacies and limits of American cultural criticism, 1910-50. In C. A. Warren & M.
D. Vavrus (Eds.) American cultural studies (pp. 23-56). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Kim, Y., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2006). Civic engagement from a communication infrastructure perspective. Communication Theory, 16,
Latham, A. A. (2003, February). Liberal education for global citizenship: Renewing Macalester's traditions of public scholarship and civic
learning. Retrieved January 9, 2008, from Macalester College, Project Pericles Website:
Lawrence, R. L., & Mealman, C. A. (1999, May). Collaborative ways of knowing: Storytelling, metaphor and the emergence of the
collaborative self. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Adult Education Research Conference, Dekalb, IL.
Levasseur, D. G., & Carlin, D. B. (2001). Egocentric argument and the public sphere: Citizen deliberations on public policy and
policymakers. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 4, 407-431. Available at:
Lipari, L. (2002). Queering the public sphere: Liberalism and the rhetoric of rights. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 169-175.
Maher, T., Pennell, J., & Osterman, L. (2003). Sociology in the neighborhood: A university-community collaborative model for
transformative change. Humanity & Society, 27(2), 50-66.
Malina, A. (2002). Community networking and perceptions of civic value. Communications: The European Journal of Communication
Research, 27, 211-234.
Manning, P. (1999). Categories of knowledge and information flows: Reasons for the decline of the British Labour and Industrial
Correspondents' Group. Media, Culture & Society, 21, 313-336. Available at: http://mcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/21/3/313
McCoy, M. L., & Scully, P. L. (2002). Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need? National
Civic Review, 91(2), 117-135. Available at: http://www.ncl.org/publications/ncr/91-2/ncr91-2_article.pdf
Mitchell, G. R. (2004). Public argument action research and the learning curve of new social movements. Argumentation & Advocacy, 40,
Negt, O., & Kluge, A. (1993). Public sphere and experience: Toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Nelson, C. (1999). Academic freedom. In C. Nelson & S. Watt (Eds.), Academic keywords: A devil's dictionary for higher education (pp.
22-35). New York: Routledge. Available at: http://www.cary-nelson.org/nelson/acadfree.html
Nelson, C. (1999). The corporate university. In C. Nelson & S. Watt (Eds.), Academic keywords: A devil's dictionary for higher education
(pp. 84-98). New York: Routledge. Available at: http://www.cary-nelson.org/nelson/corpuniv.html
Nelson, C. (1999, April 16). The war against the faculty. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B4. Available at:
Palmer, P. J. (1987). Community, conflict, and ways of knowing: Ways to deepen our educational agenda. Change, 19 (5), 20-25.
Available at: http://www.couragerenewal.org/images/stories/pdfs/rr_community.pdf
Penman, R. (1996). Imagining conversation and community. Australian Journal of Communication, 23(2), 17-23.
Pennsylvania State University Office of Undergraduate Education. (2007, November 27). The laboratory for public scholarship and
democracy. Accessed December 13, 2007 at http://www.publicscholarship.psu.edu/
Phillips, K. R. (1996). The spaces of public dissension: Reconsidering the public sphere. Communication Monographs, 63, 231-248.
Preoteasa, I. (2002). Intellectuals and the public sphere in post-communist Romania: A discourse analytical perspective. Discourse and
Society, 13, 269-292. Available at: http://das.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/13/2/269
Priest, S. H. (Ed.). (2005). Communication impact: Designing research that matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Rakow, L. F. (1999). The public at the table: From public access to public participation. New Media & Society, 1(1), 74-82.
Rakow, L. F., Belter, B., Dyrstad, H., Hallsten, J., Johnson, J., & Indvik, K. (2003). The talk of movers and shakers: Class conflict in the
making of a community disaster. Southern Communication Journal, 69(1), 37-50.
Rakow, L. F. (2005). Why did the scholar cross the road? Community action research and the citizen-scholar. In S. H. Priest (Ed.),
Communication impact: Designing research that matters (pp. 5-17). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ramaley, J. A. (2000). Change as a scholarly act: Higher education research transfer to practice. New Directions for Higher Education,
no. 110, 75-88. Available at: http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=9181050
Ramaley, J. A. (2006). Public scholarship: Making sense of an emerging synthesis. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 105,
85-97. Available at: http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=20269015
Ramsey, R. E. (1998). Suffering wonder: Wooing and courting in the public sphere. Communication Theory, 8, 455-475. Available at:
Reviere, R. (2001). Toward an afrocentric research methodology. Journal of Black Studies, 31, 709-728. Available at:
Rice, R. E. (2003, Fall). Rethinking scholarship and engagement: The struggle for new meanings. Campus Compact Reader, 4(1), 1-9.
Riley, D. R. (2006). Teaching global citizenship: Reflections on the American Indian Housing Initiative. New Directions for Teaching and
Learning, no. 105, 51-61. Available at: http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=20269018
Scheufele, D. A. (2005). Creating informed deliberation: The role of impact surveys in community decision making. In S. H. Priest (Ed.),
Communication impact: Designing research that matters (pp. 19-31). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Schuler, D. (2001). Cultivating society's civic intelligence: Patterns for a new 'world brain'. Information, Communication & Society, 4,
157-181. Available at: http://www.scn.org/commnet/civic-intelligence.pdf
Shapiro, H. T. (2005). A larger sense of purpose: Higher education and society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sligo, F., & Culligan, N. (2005, July). Rethinking research assumptions about community, and community assumptions about research: The
literacy and employment programme. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Communication
Association, Christchurch, New Zealand. Available at:
Smith, L. T. (1999). Colonizing knowledges. In Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (pp. 58-77). London: Zed
Sparks, C. (2001). The internet and the global public sphere. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication
in the future of democracy (pp. 75-95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Squires, C. R. (2002). Rethinking the black public sphere: An alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres. Communication Theory,
12, 446-468. Available at: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x
Stoecker, R. (2002). Practices and challenges of community-based research. The Journal of Public Affairs, 6, 219-239.
Thrift, N. (1985). Flies and germs: A geography of knowledge. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social relations and spatial structures (pp.
366-403). New York: St. Martin's Press.
The University of Minnesota Council on Public Engagement. (2003, May 15). Reports and references – 2003 COPE annual report.
Accessed December 13, 2007 at: http://www1.umn.edu/civic/reports/prelim2.html
Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Wharton-Michael, P., Janke, E. M., Karim, R., Syvertsen, A. K., & Wray, L. D. (2006). An explication of public scholarship objectives. New
Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 105, 63-72. Available at:
Wilson, A. C. (2004). Reclaiming our humanity: Decolonization and the recovery of Indigenous knowledge. In D. A. Mihesuah & A. C.
Wilson, (Eds.), Indigenizing the academy: Transforming scholarship and empowering communities (pp. 69-87). Lincoln, NE:
University of Nebraska Press.
Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of
Communication, 50(1), 71-92. Available at: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02834.x
Yapa, L. (2006). Public scholarship in the postmodern university. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 105, 73-83. Available at:
Zoller, H. (2000). 'A place you haven't visited before': Creating the conditions for community dialogue. Southern Communication Journal,