Open Forum Sessions and Preliminary Results
A series of HLC self-study open forums were held to allow the campus community to hear the preliminary results of the self-study and provide feedback on the final report that will be submitted to the HLC. Open forums were also streamed live online. Feedback is now closed.
Criterion Report Preliminary Results
Criterion 1 – Mission
Open Forum held March 7, 2013
Criterion 1 Draft Report
We consider whether our mission:
- Is clear, current, publicly available, and aligns with our vision for the future.
- Guides our institutional decision making and operations.
- Shapes the services we provide to our students and the public.
We also are asked to demonstrate that our mission reflects and encourages engagement with a diverse society.
Criterion 2 – Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct
Open Forum held March 19, 2013
Criterion 2 Draft Report
We consider whether:
- Our policies, processes, and operations are fair and ethical.
- We present the institution clearly and completely to students and the public.
- We are committed to freedom of expression.
- We ensure the responsible discovery and application of knowledge.
We also consider if our governing board is autonomous enough to make decisions in the best interest of our institution.
Criterion 3 – Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support
Open Forum held March 26, 2013
Criterion 3 Draft Report
We consider whether:
- Our degree programs are current and appropriate.
- We provide students with a high-quality educational experience.
- We provide the resources and support necessary to help students learn effectively.
- We offer an enriched educational environment.
We explore such topics as our Essential Studies Program, student research opportunities, student advising, learning spaces, support for faculty and staff, and faculty evaluation.
Criterion 4 – Teaching and Learning: Evaluation and Improvement
Open Forum held April 2, 2013
Criterion 4 Draft Report
We consider whether:
- We have appropriate policies and procedures in place to ensure the quality of our educational programs.
- We have effective ways to collect, analyze and use assessment data to enhance student learning.
- We are committed to improving student retention, persistence and completion rates.
We place an emphasis on educational achievement and continuous improvement through assessment.
Criterion 5 – Resources, Planning and Institutional Effectiveness
Open Forum held April 9, 2013
Criterion 5 Draft Report
We consider whether:
- We have and use sufficient resources (i.e., fiscal and personnel) and infrastructure (i.e., physical and technological).
- We have appropriate governance and administrative structures for effective leadership and collaboration.
- We engage in effective planning and resource allocation.
- We demonstrate efforts to continuously improve our University.
We examine how well we fulfill our mission, improve the quality of our educational offerings, and respond to future challenges and opportunities.
