Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Institutional Review Board (IRB)?
The IRB is a campus-wide committee charged with the review of research involving human participants to assure that the rights, welfare, and safety of participants are protected.
When is IRB review of research necessary?
A proposed project that requires IRB review must meet the definition of human subject research as outlined in federal regulations that govern the work of the IRB. According to the regulations:
Research is defined as "...a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge."
Systematic means that there is a research plan in place that will utilize accepted research methodologies to test a hypothesis. Generalizable knowledge means that the results of the study may be applied to a broader population beyond the study population. Plans to publish or present research findings or to use them toward fulfillment of an academic degree are some examples of creating generalizable knowledge.
Human subjects are living individuals about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research:
- Obtains information or biospecimens through intervention or interaction with an individual, and uses, studies, or analyzes the information or biospecimens; or
- Obtains, uses, studies, analyzes or generates identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens.
Intervention includes both physical procedures by which information or biospecimens are gathered (e.g., venipuncture) and manipulations of the subjects’ environment that are performed for research purposes.
Interaction includes communication or interpersonal contact between investigator and subject (e.g., surveys and interviews).
Private information includes:
- information about behavior that occurs in a context in which an individual can reasonably expect that no observation or recording is taking place; or
- information that has been provided for specific purposes by an individual and which the individual can reasonably expect will not be made public (e.g., a medical record).
Identifiable private information is private information for which the identify of the subject is or may readily be ascertained by the investigator or associated with the information.
Identifiable biospecimen: A biospecimen for which the identity of the subject is or may readily be ascertained by the investigator or associated with the information.
Who is required to submit a research protocol to the UND IRB?
Any faculty, staff, student, or agent of the University of North Dakota conducting research involving human participants is required to submit a protocol to the UND IRB before undertaking any research.
What is the purpose of IRB review?
In fulfillment of the terms of UND's federalwide assurance with the DHHS Office of Human Research Protections, the IRB is required to prospectively review human subject research to ensure that the rights, welfare, and safety of participants will be protected. Specifically, participants should have the right to:
- be told everything they need to know about the research before being asked to participate;
- freely choose whether or not to participate in a research project;
- be aware of any available alternatives;
- be free to quit participating at any time;
- have their privacy and confidentiality of their information respected;
- know that their safety and welfare come first;
- keep all the legal rights they already have; and
- ask questions or voice concerns to the investigator or the IRB.
These rights are extended to participants of all UND human subject research projects, including those projects that may involve little or no risk, or may be eligible under one of the exempt categories. Through the protocol review process, the IRB obtains the necessary information to verify that the project will be conducted so that participants are afforded these rights.
Projects involving a vulnerable population (children, pregnant women and fetuses, or prisoners), and/or some level of risk (e.g., physical, psychological, social, legal, privacy, employability, etc.) require a higher level of review and have more stringent requirements.
By reviewing all materials that will be shown to subjects (recruitment messages, invitations, consent forms), the IRB is able to verify that participants will be fully informed of the nature of the research, what is being asked of them, as well as any potential risks, harms and benefits.
How is the IRB review category determined?
There are three categories of IRB review: exempt, expedited, and full board. Exempt and expedited protocols must meet the definition of minimal risk: "...probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinary encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological tests." Exempt and expedited protocols are reviewed by a single board member. Protocols that must go before the full board have risks that are greater than minimal. These protocols are reviewed by the full board to determine if the increased risks to subjects are acceptable.
- Exempt does not mean that you do not have to submit a protocol to the IRB. It means you do not have to submit an annual review of approved research.
- Expedited does not mean that the protocol turnaround time is really fast. It means that a single board member can review the protocol, instead of it having to go before the full board.
What may impact the timely review of an IRB protocol?
- Students list themselves as principal investigator instead of their faculty advisor (required).
- Required IRB training is not current.
- Plan for protecting privacy of participants and maintaining confidentiality of their data is inadequate.
- Consent document lacks required elements.
- Missing or incomplete responses on protocol.
- Insufficient detail in description of procedures.
- Information on the protocol and/or consent form is inconsistent.
- Missing attachments or permission letter(s).
- Funding proposal not linked.
- Misunderstanding of eligibility for exempt status.
- Protocol submitted at the beginning of a semester, the busiest time in the IRB office.
- Protocol submitted during semester breaks when IRB reviewers (who are faculty) aren't always on campus.
What happens if a human subject research project is conducted without IRB approval?
The implications of engaging in activities that qualify as research subject to IRB review without obtaining such review are significant. This is a serious violation of UND policies and federal regulations. Data generated from research conducted without IRB approval cannot be used in publications or presentations or to satisfy requirements toward a degree.